Evaluation of the Impact of a Tourniquet Training Program: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Among the main preventable causes of death in the area of operations is external exsanguinating hemorrhage in the extremities, hence the importance of the tourniquet as a therapeutic tool in this type of injury and, therefore, of the training of personnel participating in international missions. The main objective of this study is to determine the impact of training in the application of this device. This is a quasi-experimental, prospective, cross-sectional study, carried out with 97 healthy volunteers, military personnel who perform their work in the Royal Guard barracks of El Pardo. The study was conducted between June 2019 and July 2021. The correct determination of the device placement site and the times of correct device placement were evaluated by determining whether there was blood flow using Doppler ultrasound measurements. Statistically significant results were obtained for application time (76.68 s to 58.06 s; p < 0.001), correct device placement (p < 0.001), and achievement of complete ischemia in the upper extremity (23.7% pretest vs. 24.7% post-test; p < 0.001). In the lower extremity, after training, longer application duration (43.33 s to 47.30 s) and lower ischemia achievement (59.8% pretest vs. 37.8% post-test) were obtained. Standardized and regulated training improves device application. More intensive training is necessary to obtain better results.

Validation of an evaluation instrument for responders in tactical casualty care simulations.

OBJECTIVE: to construct and validate a tool for the evaluation of responders in tactical casualty care simulations. METHOD: three rubrics for the application of a tourniquet, an emergency bandage and haemostatic agents recommended by the Hartford Consensus were developed and validated. Validity and reliability were studied. Validation was performed by 4 experts in the field and 36 nursing participants who were selected through convenience sampling. Three rubrics with 8 items were evaluated (except for the application of an emergency bandage, for which 7 items were evaluated). Each simulation was evaluated by 3 experts. RESULTS: an excellent score was obtained for the correlation index for the 3 simulations and 2 levels that were evaluated (competent and expert). The mean score for the application of a tourniquet was 0.897, the mean score for the application of an emergency bandage was 0.982, and the mean score for the application of topical haemostats was 0.805. CONCLUSION: this instrument for the evaluation of nurses in tactical casualty care simulations is considered useful, valid and reliable for training in a prehospital setting for both professionals who lack experience in tactical casualty care and those who are considered to be experts.

Validation of an evaluation instrument for responders in tactical casualty care simulations / Validação de um instrumento de avaliação para a prática de cuidados de saúde estratégicos / Validación de un instrumento de evaluación para la práctica de la atención sanitaria táctica

Objective: to construct and validate a tool for the evaluation of responders in tactical casualty care simulations. Method: three rubrics for the application of a tourniquet, an emergency bandage and haemostatic agents recommended by the Hartford Consensus were developed and validated. Validity and reliability were studied. Validation was performed by 4 experts in the field and 36 nursing participants who were selected through convenience sampling. Three rubrics with 8 items were evaluated (except for the application of an emergency bandage, for which 7 items were evaluated). Each simulation was evaluated by 3 experts. Results: an excellent score was obtained for the correlation index for the 3 simulations and 2 levels that were evaluated (competent and expert). The mean score for the application of a tourniquet was 0.897, the mean score for the application of an emergency bandage was 0.982, and the mean score for the application of topical haemostats was 0.805. Conclusion: this instrument for the evaluation of nurses in tactical casualty care simulations is considered useful, valid and reliable for training in a prehospital setting for both professionals who lack experience in tactical casualty care and those who are considered to be experts.

Objetivo: construir e validar um instrumento de avaliação da prática, por meio da simulação, nos cuidados de saúde estratégicos. Método: três instrumentos para práticas de avaliação de aplicação do torniquete, bandagem de emergência e agente hemostático recomendados pelo Consenso de Hartford foram desenvolvidos e validados. A validade e a confiabilidade foram estudadas. A validação foi realizada por quatro especialistas da área e trinta e seis enfermeiros participantes selecionados por amostragem por conveniência. Três instrumentos de avaliação com 8 itens foram avaliados (com exceção da bandagem de emergência, que tinha 7 itens para avaliar). Cada prática foi avaliada por três especialistas. Resultados: uma pontuação excelente foi obtida no cálculo do índice de correlação para as três práticas e nos dois níveis avaliados (competente e especialista). A pontuação média para a aplicação do torniquete foi de 0,897, para o curativo de emergência foi de 0,982 e para a aplicação de agentes hemostáticos tópicos foi de 0,805. Conclusão: este instrumento de avaliação da prática por meio de simulação nos cuidados de saúde estratégicos é considerado útil, válido e confiável para o treinamento no contexto pré-hospitalar tanto dos profissionais que não possuem experiência nos cuidados estratégicos quanto nos considerados peritos.

Objetivo: construir y validar un instrumento de evaluación de la práctica, mediante simulación, en la atención sanitaria táctica. Método: se construyeron y validaron tres rúbricas de las prácticas de aplicación del torniquete, vendaje de emergencia y agente hemostático recomendadas por el Consenso Hartford. Se estudió la validez y fiabilidad. La validación se realizó por cuatro expertos en la materia y treinta y seis participantes enfermeros que fueron la muestra de conveniencia. Se evaluaron tres rúbricas con 8 ítems (excepto para el vendaje de emergencia que fueron 7 ítems a evaluar). Cada práctica fue evaluada por tres expertos. Resultados: se ha obtenido una excelente puntuación en el cálculo del índice de correlación para las tres prácticas y en los dos niveles evaluados (competente y experto). La puntuación media para la rúbrica de aplicación del torniquete fue de 0.897, la del vendaje de emergencia 0.982 y para la aplicación de hemostáticos tópicos 0.805. Conclusión: este instrumento de evaluación de la práctica mediante simulación en la atención sanitaria se considera útil, válido y fiable para la formación en el entorno prehospitalario tanto de profesionales que carecen de experiencia en atención táctica como de aquellos considerados como expertos.

A civilian tactical survival chain for incidents involving multiple intentionalinjury victims: the Victory I Consensus Report. / Consenso Victoria I: la cadena de supervivencia táctica civil ante incidentes de múltiples víctimas intencionados.

EN: International guidelines recommend adapting military health care protocols to emergencies involving multiple intentional-injury victims in civilian environments. Adaptations can reflect similarities in types of injuries or issues of provider safety and that arise in military and some civilian emergencies. Because more experience with such incidents has been gained in the United States, most of the literature on this topic discusses emergency medical systems that differ from the ones operating in the autonomous communities of Spain, where varying resources and procedures are mandated by local authorities charged with preparing for emergencies. However, common elements are present, offering a framework and principles to apply when drafting evidence-based plans for effective, efficient response to multiple-victim emergencies. We think that participants at each point in the chain of survival must have clear missions and understand the roles they play in the various zones that comprise the scene of an emergency. Therefore this consensus paper attempts to define the relevant principles and roles for participants at all levels, from occasional first responders up to staff at trauma referral centers.

ES: Son múltiples las recomendaciones internacionales que aconsejan adaptar modelos asistenciales del entorno militar a incidentes de múltiples víctimas intencionados (IMVI) ocurridos en el entorno civil, bien por el tipo de patrón lesional, bien por aspectos de seguridad y autoprotección. Debido a la experiencia en Norteamérica, donde este tipo de situaciones son más frecuentes, casi toda la bibliografía y referencias existentes no se corresponden con un modelo de sistemas de emergencias médicas como el que existe en las distintas comunidades autónomas españolas, con sus diferentes medios y procedimientos tal y como viene estipulado por sus competencias exclusivas en esta materia. No obstante, se han detectado una serie de elementos comunes que pueden servir de referencia para elaborar un plan de respuesta a los IMVI, basados en la evidencia y utilizando principios de actuación dirigidos a una acción eficaz y eficiente. Pensamos que cada actor de los eslabones de esta cadena asistencial debe tener clara su misión, su rol y su función en las diferentes zonas de la escena, y así se intentan definir en este documento de consenso, desde un primer interviniente ocasional hasta la asistencia definitiva en los centros de referencia para pacientes traumatizados.

Consenso Victoria I: la cadena de supervivencia táctica civil ante incidentes de múltiples víctimas intencionados / A civilian tactical survival chain for incidents involving multiple intentionalinjury victims: the Victory I Consensus Report

Son múltiples las recomendaciones internacionales que aconsejan adaptar modelos asistenciales del entorno militar a incidentes de múltiples víctimas intencionados (IMVI) ocurridos en el entorno civil, bien por el tipo de patrón lesional, bien por aspectos de seguridad y autoprotección. Debido a la experiencia en Norteamérica, donde este tipo de situaciones son más frecuentes, casi toda la bibliografía y referencias existentes no se corresponden con un modelo de sistemas de emergencias médicas como el que existe en las distintas comunidades autónomas españolas, con sus diferentes medios y procedimientos tal y como viene estipulado por sus competencias exclusivas en esta materia. No obstante, se han detectado una serie de elementos comunes que pueden servir de referencia para elaborar un plan de respuesta a los IMVI, basados en la evidencia y utilizando principios de actuación dirigidos a una acción eficaz y eficiente. Pensamos que cada actor de los eslabones de esta cadena asistencial debe tener clara su misión, su rol y su función en las diferentes zonas de la escena, y así se intentan definir en este documento de consenso, desde un primer interviniente ocasional hasta la asistencia definitiva en los centros de referencia para pacientes traumatizados

International guidelines recommend adapting military health care protocols to emergencies involving multiple intentional-injury victims in civilian environments. Adaptations can reflect similarities in types of injuries or issues of provider safety and that arise in military and some civilian emergencies. Because more experience with such incidents has been gained in the United States, most of the literature on this topic discusses emergency medical systems that differ from the ones operating in the autonomous communities of Spain, where varying resources and procedures are mandated by local authorities charged with preparing for emergencies. However, common elements are present, offering a framework and principles to apply when drafting evidence-based plans for effective, efficient response to multiple-victim emergencies. We think that participants at each point in the chain of survival must have clear missions and understand the roles they play in the various zones that comprise the scene of an emergency. Therefore this consensus paper attempts to define the relevant principles and roles for participants at all levels, from occasional first responders up to staff at trauma referral centers

[Implementation of the Hartford Consensus and Tactical Combat Casualty Care recommendations in emergency services: a review of the literature]. / Implementación de las recomendaciones del Consenso de Hartford y Tactical Emergency Casualty Care (TECC) en los servicios de emergencia: revisión bibliográfica.

en: Recent terrorist attacks involving active shooters or improvised explosive devices have shown that traditionally sequenced emergency management leads to delays in attending victims and suboptimal outcomes. Tactical medicine, a new concept in prehospital care, emerged from experience attending the wounded in combat zones, where the Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) recommendations are applied. TCCC targets 3 main causes of preventable death in combat: bleeding from extremities, tension pneumothorax, and airway obstruction. A change in the delivery of emergency care during terrorist attacks is now required if we are to improve survival rates. To that end, strategies based on the TCCC and Hartford Consensus recommendations have been developed. Both these approaches describe procedures for both first responders and medical professionals to apply in areas under threat.

ES: Los recientes incidentes con atentados terroristas con tiradores activos o artefactos explosivos improvisados han demostrado que la atención secuencial tradicional produce retrasos en la atención a las víctimas, con resultados no totalmente satisfactorios. La medicina táctica es una nueva herramienta para aplicar en la atención prehospitalaria, que surge de la experiencia en el cuidado a los heridos en zona de combate, aplicando las recomendaciones del Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC). Mediante estas directrices, se trata de disminuir las tres principales causas de muerte prevenible en combate: hemorragia en extremidades, neumotórax a tensión y obstrucción de vía aérea. Para mejorar los índices de supervivencia en incidentes terroristas, es necesario cambiar la forma de atención de los servicios de emergencia. A partir de la experiencia obtenida con el TCCC, el Consenso Hartford y el Comité Táctical Emergency Casualty Care han desarrollado estrategias para mejorar la supervivencia. Ambos desarrollan recomendaciones sobre procedimientos de atención sanitaria dirigidos a primeros intervinientes y a profesionales para su aplicación en entorno hostil.

Implementación de las recomendaciones del Consenso de Hartford y Tactical Emergency Casualty Care (TECC) en los servicios de emergencia: revisión bibliográfica / Implementation of the Hartford Consensus and Tactical Combat Casualty Care recommendations in emergency services: a review of the literature

Los recientes incidentes con atentados terroristas con tiradores activos o artefactos explosivos improvisados han demostrado que la atención secuencial tradicional produce retrasos en la atención a las víctimas, con resultados no totalmente satisfactorios. La medicina táctica es una nueva herramienta para aplicar en la atención prehospitalaria, que surge de la experiencia en el cuidado a los heridos en zona de combate, aplicando las recomendaciones del Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC). Mediante estas directrices, se trata de disminuir las tres principales causas de muerte prevenible en combate: hemorragia en extremidades, neumotorax a tensión y obstrucción de vía aérea. Para mejorar los índices de supervivencia en incidentes terroristas, es necesario cambiar la forma de atención de los servicios de emergencia. A partir de la experiencia obtenida con el TCCC, el Consenso Hartford y el Comite Tactical Emergency Casualty Care han desarrollado estrategias para mejorar la supervivencia. Ambos desarrollan recomendaciones sobre procedimientos de atención sanitaria dirigidos a primeros intervinientes y a profesionales para su aplicación en entorno hostil (AU)

Recent terrorist attacks involving active shooters or improvised explosive devices have shown that traditionally sequenced emergency management leads to delays in attending victims and suboptimal outcomes. Tactical medicine, a new concept in prehospital care, emerged from experience attending the wounded in combat zones, where the Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) recommendations are applied. TCCC targets 3 main causes of preventable death in combat: bleeding from extremities, tension pneumothorax, and airway obstruction. A change in the delivery of emergency care during terrorist attacks is now required if we are to improve survival rates. To that end, strategies based on the TCCC and Hartford Consensus recommendations have been developed. Both these approaches describe procedures for both first responders and medical professionals to apply in areas under threat (AU)